Managing personal mobile phone use continues to present challenges for employers, particularly where it begins to impact productivity or workplace safety. This is especially critical in industries such as construction, where employees are often engaged in hands-on work and lapses in attention can create serious health and safety risks.
Two decisions of the Fair Work Commission highlight how excessive phone use may justify dismissal in certain circumstances, and the importance of following a fair process.
Recent caselaw:
Excessive phone use on site
In Mr Sam Murray v The Trustee for SDM Trust [2026] FWC 896 (24 March 2026), a minor apprentice employed by a small roofing business was dismissed for repeatedly using his mobile phone during work hours.
Over an 18-month period, the employee was observed using his phone “over and over again,” including while on site. He was also described as “hiding and bludging,” and the employer received multiple client complaints. The employee had been issued a final warning regarding his conduct prior to dismissal.
The Commission dismissed the unfair dismissal application, finding that the employer had complied with the Small Business Fair Dismissal Code. In particular, the employer:
This case reinforces that, where a small business follows the Code, dismissal for repeated misconduct of this kind can be lawful.
Excessive phone use in the office
In the case of Lynda Murphy v Clear Day Pty Ltd [2022] FWC 373 an office-based employee sent more than 1,000 personal text messages during work hours and regularly attended to a separate business while at work.
Examples of her conduct included sending 34 messages in one morning and 76 the following day. After being directed to turn off her phone during work hours, she sent a further 73 messages within 4.5 hours shortly thereafter.
Her employment was terminated for ongoing excessive phone use and failure to follow a reasonable direction. Although there were procedural deficiencies in how the dismissal was carried out, the Commission ultimately found the dismissal was not unfair given the seriousness of the conduct.
The Commission observed that the level of phone activity was incompatible with the proper performance of her role and indicated that little meaningful work could have been completed during those periods.
Key Takeaways for employers:
If you have any questions about your rights as an employer or your obligation when considering the termination of an employee, please contact the Workplace Relations Team:
📞 (02) 6175 5900
📧 workplace@mba.org.au